Follow on Twitter

Sunday, 14 February 2010

A Greek Tragedy & Other Interesting Statistics

I complied some of these statistics from different sources on the Internet
  • Fiscal Deficit of Greece: 12.7% of GDP 
  • Workers in Greece have the second highest level of actual hours worked.  
  • Greece needs to refinance about Euro 64 billion worth of debt - most of it before April. By end of January they raise about Euro 8 billion. 
  • EU wants Greece to cuts it budget by 8.7 percent this year and down to three percent within three years.  
  • The total debt of Greece is Euro 254 billion other estimates place the debt at Euro 300 billion.  
  • Nearly 30 percent of Greece's economy is underground and hence beyond the scope of taxes. 
  • If Greece swallows bitter pill and makes the budget cuts, that means that nominal GDP will decline by (at least) 4-5% over the next 3 years. Since tax revenues will also decline, even with tax increases, it means that the country will have to make even further cuts, over and above the ones contemplated to get to that magic 3% fiscal deficit to GDP - a great recipe for an economic depression. 
  • Add into the equation that borrowing another €100 billion (at a minimum) over the next few years, while in the midst of that recession, will only add to the already huge debt and interest costs. 
  • Unfortunately for Greece it cannot take the easiest way out by devaluing its currency or printing more in order to take up 'quantitative easing' like UK, USA or Japan, because it does not have a national currency. (A great reason why the Euro could fail). 
  • Bank of International Settlements (the central bankers' central bank) says that the largest holders of Greek debt are the French, Swiss and Germans. In June 2009 it was France €86 billion, Switzerland €60bn, and Germany €44 billion. Other estimates place this at of France €73b, Switzerland €59b, and Germany €39b. In terms of GDP, for Germany it is minimal - just over 1%. Of more concern, for France it is nearly 3%, and for Belgium 2.5%.
That is not all. Others are not far behind:
  • By the way, the politically right word to refer to the troubled countries of Portugal, Spain, Ireland, Italy and Greece (which were also refereed to as PIIGS) is now Club O'Med. 
  • Barclays Capital says the net external liabilities of Greece are 87pc of GDP, or €208bn (£182bn). Spain is worse at 91pc (€950bn), and Portugal worse yet at 108pc (€177bn); Ireland is 68pc (€123bn), Italy is 23pc, (€347bn). Add East Europe's bubble and foreign debts top €2 trillion. 
  • It has been pointed out that the total exposure of various countries to Club O'Med is $853bn for France (30pc of its GDP), and $707bn for Germany (19pc of GDP).

Hold your breath! the UK takes the cake: It has been pointed out that UK banks have a 250 billion pounds exposure to the Club O'Med countries.

See the following table

 




Saturday, 30 January 2010

COMMODITY CORNER
Long/Short Position of Traders
As on 26th January 2009
Source:  CFTC
Net Change over previous reporting period (19th January 2010) in Brackets
Silver Contract 5000 Troy Ounces
Gold Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Copper contract in 25,000 pounds
Palladium Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Platinum contract in 50 Troy ounces


SILVERAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer153,070(-10,538)9,085(-244)69,086(-1,860)
Managed Money153,070(-10,538)26,889-10,629)1,768(+1,331)
Swap Dealers153,070(-10,538)18,662(+1,480)15,008(-4,147)

GOLDAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer651,455 (-70,630)57,233(-3,164)233,770(-24,772)
Managed Money651,455 (-70,630)184,073(-20,047)7,917(-96)
Swap Dealers651,455 (-70,630)43,862(+2,833)129,080(-9,666)

COPPER GRADE 1All Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer141,166(-2,276)5,719(+409)70,903(-2,712)
Managed Money141,166(-2,276)43,187(-1,822)13,356(-3,311)
Swap Dealers141,166(-2,276)44,874(-1,471)8,847 (+42)



PALLADIUMAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer23,354(+92)766(+96)14,066(-595)
Managed Money23,354(+92)12,129(+267)1,478(+249)
Swap Dealers23,354(+92)3,081(-108)4,121(+85)


PLATINUMAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer34,697(+345)616(+50)16,382(-799)
Managed Money34,697(+345)18,964(-83)1,092(+182)
Swap Dealers34,697(+345)5,057(+92)11,843(-94)

Sunday, 24 January 2010

The Advantage of Selective Amnesia or The Sign of the Times we live in:

Today (Sunday, 24 January 2010) headlines in some newspapers prominently displayed the smashing performance of Maruti Suzuki, the largest car company in India. The papers in their enthusiasm declared that Maruti's Q3 net profits had doubled, while its sales were up 62.5 percent.  That sounded to me like the overnight sprouting of the equivalent of the Amazon forest in the Sahara region. So like our name suggests we took a slightly Different View and decided to peek into history of the company (after slogging digging out various things from the net we found that we took the round route to a relatively easy task. Maruti actually makes it easy for history guys by placing their quarterly results on their website).

The reason why we believe that the story deserves a blog spot is that Maruti is a good barometer of the India consumption story. We took up a very simply task that was more based on one simple question: What was the actual sequential quarterly growth of the company? Forget what our media says. We believe that is important that we keep an eye on that perspective because it provides more clues about the nature of this recovery and where we are heading?

A word about the company's sales growth:  The third quarter is generally speaking the best time for the company with festival sales. I dug out some of these details and it clearly shows psychologically how good it is to experience selective amnesia (as our media and investors would love to). Minus the festival sales & exports Maruti is likely to have either had tepid sales (at best) or even a loss at worst. Considering the fact that the commodity costs are likely to move up in Q4, the results at the end of March should show us that the emperor actually has no clothes. But what does it matter, anyway by March we are likely to have an outlier event in the form of a 'black swan' in the form of either Greece or Spain or innumerable countries, apart from the usual deeply troubled Uncle Sam (who is increasingly looking like a Great Gandpa). Then all our analysts and policy makers would be back to claiming that they cannot help being off the track on their forecasts simply because of the fact that this is 'once in a hundred year event'. That is the advantage of selective amnesia. We are not facing 'once in a generation crisis' but have had these crisis with amazing frequency: 1997 (South East Asia Crisis), 1998 (LTCM collapse), 2000 (tech bubble), Argentina default, 2006 crash in Emerging markets, and the freshly minted, recent financial crisis.

Maruti Announced headlines (as in the papers) - All figures Over the corresponding previous year

Q3: Net profits Doubles
Net sales Up 62.5%
Operating Margin:16.33 vs 10.26 in the corresponding previous year.
Gross sales 804.645 cr
Total income from operations:750.285 (after excluding excise, etc)
Total Expenditure: 657.172 crores
Sales of Domestic Vehicles: 218,910
Exports 39,116
Total vehicles sold: 258,026

My peek into history (considering the fact that i am a history guy):

Q2 - September Quarter: Sales:720.261 crores
Total income (including other income: 731.262
Total Expenditure: 628.647
Total Domestic sales: 209,083
Exports of cars: 37,105
Total cars sold: 246,188

Wow Great Results: Sequential Quarter on Quarter basis: number of extra cars sold: 11,838 cars (Minus the 2000 cars, which was largely due the government subsidy for fuel efficient cars, which has since ended)

What an age we live in? An era when 9827 more car sales is considered great news that deserves bold headlines.

I leave the conclusion about the nature of economic recovery and its shape ('V', 'U' or 'L') to the better judgement of readers.
COMMODITY CORNER
Long/Short Position of Traders

As on 19th January 2009
Source:  CFTC

Net Change over previous reporting period (12th January 2010) in Brackets
Silver Contract 5000 Troy Ounces
Gold Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Copper contract in 25,000 pounds
Palladium Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Platinum contract in 50 Troy ounces


SILVERAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer163,608(+3,740)9,329(-171)70,947(-164)
Managed Money163,608(+3,740)37,518(+1,119)438(-264)
Swap Dealers163,608(+3,740)17,182(+601)19,155(+560)


GOLDAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer722,085 (+12,993)60,397(+2,929)258,542(-2,347)
Managed Money722,085 (+12,993)204,120(-1,191)8,013(-2,953)
Swap Dealers722,085 (+12,993)41,029(+3,058)138,746(+247)


COPPER GRADE 1All Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer143,442(-8,307)5,310(+841)73,614(-2,141)
Managed Money143,442(-8,307)45,009(-1,281)16,667(-6,763)
Swap Dealers143,442(-8,307)46,345(-7,018)8,805 (+20)


PALLADIUMAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer23,262(-175)670(-65)14,661(-924)
Managed Money23,262(-175)11,862(-4)1,229(+181)
Swap Dealers23,262(-175)3,189(-152)4,036(+98)


PLATINUMAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer34,352(-150)566(-66)17,181(-348)
Managed Money34,352(-150)19,047(+451)910(+373)
Swap Dealers34,352(-150)4,965(-56)11,937(-785)
COMMODITY CORNER
LME Base Metal Inventory Position

As on 22 January 2010



CommodityOpening StockClosing StocksNet ChangeWarrantsCancelled Warrants
Aluminium4,640,7504,635,075-5,6754,397,850237,225
Copper534,650534,200-450522,12512,075
Lead153,175153,475+300152,900575
Nickel161,706162,270+564160,6621,608
Tin27,32527,375+5026,150865
Zinc490,100491,200+1100487,7253,475

Thursday, 21 January 2010

Is the World Economy heading for a sustainable recovery?

In a nutshell, the above question seems to be uppermost in the minds of everybody  and that  question is asked all the time. As always six economists will produce seven different theories, we think it would be good to ask some questions that may help in answering the above question.

At the outset, it is imperative that we underscore the fact that we do not claim to know the answer, though we continue to be extremely skeptical of the present recovery.  We have consistently held that the present economic momentum will taper off. The consequences will be disastrous if the government decides to step back. Now, World Bank (which is always late to the party) has said the same thing. therefore it may be important to look at the sum of different pieces that comprise the whole and then ask pertinent questions.

We have decided to pose two questions that we think are important at the present juncture. 

Question 1:
We all know that a sustainable economic recovery will mean a rise in the demand for the metals and as a natural corollary, the prices at a later date. The question that we need to ask is that should the rising metal prices be construed as rising demand?

Those who would look at the above question should keep in mind that a recent article offered the following  intersting statistics:
  • Global Auto production accounts for about 25% of the aluminum usage, 25% of Zinc usage, 15% of Steel usage, and about 8-10% of copper usage.
  • Auto Catalysts accounts for vehicles accounts for 40-50% of the Platinum and Palladium demand.
  • Interestingly Global auto output is expected to rise by about 20% or about 71 million cars in 2010, more than 2008 production and only about 3% below the peak level of production seen in 2007 - the peak year of the bubble era. 
Considering the above, as well as the fact that the process of debt deleveraging is just starting (as is clear from the recent US credit growth statistics), collapse in capital spending all over USA, Europe and especially Japan, we should ask ourselves: are we going to see a sustained demand for Automobiles?

A more pertinent problem is in the form of inventory of all the base metals, which has reached the highest point since 2004 (in some cases since 2000). 

Question 2: 
Can China lead the world out of the morass that we find ourselves in after the recent economic meltdown?


The short answer is possible, but be weary of a straight forward answer. There are many more issues. The Chinese economy has been on a roll (or more like roller coaster to be less economic with the truth). China's economic recovery is built more on quicksand than solid healthy economic foundations. In short, it based on a few important factors: (a) Government spending, (b) Loan growth, and (c) asset market rise.

All three are (to say the least) aspects of the recovery that dont lend much confidence. Of the above three factors, the only factor that has a semblance of possible continuity for the time being is government spending. But how long? Nobody knows. If the tepid economic conditions were to continue, then it is likely that in the next year or China is likely to run into a capital account deficit and then their mercantalist policies are likely to reach a dead end.

The loan growth cannot continue as it has already reached dangerous proportions. Loan disbursements last year are at clearly unsustainable levels. A decline in new loans will invariablely mean that that the asset markets will collapse if there is no new money entering them. A long-time China observer recently pointed out that to maintain economic growth of 8% this year, banks in China will have to increase lending that is equivalent of 30% of its GDP (to place this in perspective: the current lending is about 25% of GDP). Is that possible? It is theoretically, but practically it will not just release the 'animal spirits' of the speculators, instead it will release large 'red' dragons all over that country.

The only way China can (in the long-term, not in the short-term) help the world considering all the present imbalances in the world economy is by increasing internal consumption. But, that is easier said than done. The first impediment to that is that wages are too low. China cannot increase them as that would destory the present economic model that enabled it to become the 'workshop of the world' (or is it sweat shop of the world?). Second impediment: China's current domestic consumption is about 37% (while in the case of USA it is about 71% and in the case of India it is about 65%). Ironically, domestic consumption in China has declined from nearly 50% to the present 37% in the past 25 years (when the reforms there started).

So, if a reader is convinced that they have a satisfactory answer to the above two questions, then we believe that they have deciphered the riddle to our two questions.

Wednesday, 20 January 2010

COMMODITY CORNER
Long/Short Position of Traders

As on 12th January 2009
Source:  CFTC

Net Change over previous reporting period (5th January 2010) in Brackets
Silver Contract 5000 Troy Ounces
Gold Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Copper contract in 25,000 pounds
Palladium Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Platinum contract in 50 Troy ounces


SILVERAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer159,868(+5,367)9,500 (+959)71,111(+3,642)
Managed Money159,868(+5,367)36,399(+6,152)701(-1,858)
Swap Dealers159,868(+5,367)16,581 (-452)18,595(+1,056)





GOLDAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer709,092 (+17,536)57,469(-102)260,889(+9,729)
Managed Money709,092 (+17,536)205,311(+4,024)10,966(+4,270)
Swap Dealers709,092 (+17,536)37,971(-1,338)138,499(-3,301)





COPPER GRADE 1All Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer151,749(-7,230)4,469(+149)75,756(-3,366)
Managed Money151,749(-7,230)46,290(+587)23,431(-5,474)
Swap Dealers151,749(-7,230)53,363(-10,989)8,875 (+1,056)





PALLADIUMAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer23,437(+58)735(+74)15,585(-759)
Managed Money23,437(+58)11,866(-535)1,048(+204)
Swap Dealers23,437(+58)3,341(-61)3,938(-188)





PLATINUMAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer34,502(+920)632(-141)17,529(-756)
Managed Money34,502(+920)18,596(+411)537(+212)
Swap Dealers34,502(+920)5,021(-316)12,722(+304)

Thursday, 14 January 2010

The Lessons that Investors ought to learn, but never learn

There are a number of lessons that investors (or any observer of the financial markets) need to learn but rarely do. Instead we always make the same mistake(s) with a monotony that would normally shock any rational person. I came across the following pieces of advice at the end of a roller coaster year for the economy and the market. 2010 promises to be an even bigger one (both ways, but we think it will most probably surprise everybody to the downside).
The best 'lessons' are brilliantly noted in William Eng's book: Stock Market Trading Rules: 50 Golden Trading Strategies, which is a must read for all those interested in investor psychology.

The following lessons were compiled by Jeffery Saut in a recent report

Richard Bernstein’s Lessons
1. Income is as important as are capital gains. Because most investors ignore income opportunities, income may be more important than are capital gains.
2. Most stock market indicators have never actually been tested. Most don’t work.
3. Most investors’ time horizons are much too short. Statistics indicate that day trading is largely based on luck.
4. Bull markets are made of risk aversion and undervalued assets. They are not made of cheering and a rush to buy.
5. Diversification doesn’t depend on the number of asset classes in a portfolio. Rather, it depends on the correlations between the asset classes in a portfolio.
6. Balance sheets are generally more important than are income or cash flow statements.
7. Investors should focus strongly on GAAP accounting, and should pay little attention to “pro forma” or “unaudited” financialstatements.
8. Investors should be providers of scarce capital. Return on capital is typically highest where capital is scarce.
9. Investors should research financial history as much as possible.
10. Leverage gives the illusion of wealth. Saving is wealth.

David Rosenberg’s Lessons
1. In order for an economic forecast to be relevant, it must be combined with a market call.
2. Never be a slave to the data – they are no substitutes for astute observation of the big picture.
3. The consensus rarely gets it right and almost always errs on the side of optimism – except at the bottom.
4. Fall in love with your partner, not your forecast.
5. No two cycles are ever the same.
6. Never hide behind your model.
7. Always seek out corroborating evidence.
8. Have respect for what the markets are telling you.

Bob Farrell's Lessons:
1. Markets tend to return to the mean over time.
2. Excesses in one direction will lead to an opposite excess in the other direction.
3. There are no new eras – excesses are never permanent.
4. Exponential rising and falling markets usually go further than you think.
5. The public buys the most at the top and the least at the bottom.
6. Fear and greed are stronger than long-term resolve.
7. Markets are strongest when they are broad and weakest when they narrow to a handful of blue-chips.
8. Bear markets have three stages.
9. When all the experts and forecasts agree – something else is going to happen.
10. Bull markets are more fun than bear markets.

Saturday, 9 January 2010

COMMODITY CORNER
Long/Short Position of Traders

As on 5th January 2009
Source: CFTC

Net Change over previous reporting period (29 December 2009) in Brackets
Silver Contract 5000 Troy Ounces
Gold Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Copper contract in 25,000 pounds
Palladium Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Platinum contract in 50 Troy ounces

SILVER
All Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer154,501(+2,854)8,540 (-257)67,469(-1,579)
Managed Money154,501(+2,854)30,247(+2,237)2,559(+1,181)
Swap Dealers154,501(+2,85417,033 (-1,445)17,539(+71)


GOLDAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer691,557 (+21,610)57,571(-279)251,160(+2,029)
Managed Money691,557 (+21,610)201,286(-2,298)6,696 (+672)
Swap Dealers691,557 (+21,610)39,309(+625)141,799(+944)


COPPER GRADE 1All Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer158,978(+4,013)4,320(-863)79,122(+306))
Managed Money158,978(+4,013)45,703(+856)28,904(-191)
Swap Dealers158,978(+4,013)64,352(-185)
7729 (+673)


PALLADIUMAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer23,379(+977)661(+116)16,344(+102)
Managed Money23,379(+977)12,401(-13)844(+56)
Swap Dealers23,379(+977)3,402 (+423)4,126(+716)


PLATINUMAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer33,582(+1,109)773(+268)18,285(+703)
Managed Money33,582(+1,109)18,185(+787)325(-291)
Swap Dealers33,582(+1,109)5,337(+342)12,418(+1,065)

Friday, 8 January 2010

Charts That Tell Us a Different Story

The endeavour of our blog is to provide an alternative view as the title suggests. To meet this goal we have been scouring the Internet for statistics that will enable us to meet our goal of trying to understand and explain the formation of bubbles that are forming in different asset classes. Optimism now pervades through the financial markets even the more rational among the policy makers leave alone the investing crowd (which is usually wrong) about the sustainability of this recovery and the impending return to a boom (if not immediately over the next two years).

Certain interesting statistics need to be cited so that it will enable our readers to place the present rise in the financial markets in the proper perspective.

* In April 2008, the US Budget Deficit was 1.6% of GDP. It is now closer to 9.9 percent. So after spending nearly 8.3% of GDP, the US has been able to eke out a growth in GDP of 2.2% or thereabouts.
* The US Federal Reserve's balance sheet has expanded from US$858 billion at the start of 2007 to the present more than US$2.24 trillion dollars (at the end of 2009)
* Globally, governments have pumped in nearly US$12.8 trillion (or probably more) as different forms of stimulus measures.


These must have been the 'positive surprise' for the markets and hence the rise by nearly 60% or more in most of the asset classes (i.e. from its March 2009 low).

Another predominant wisdom that we hear regularly has been that economies witness faster economic recoveries coming out of a recession. This is one of the reasons why the markets are discounting a 30% rise in earnings. Unfortunately it is only a matter time that this myth is deflated. The chart attached with this post provides the behaviour of economies coming out of recessions. It is clear that historically economies witness weak recoveries (if you can call it that) coming out of a financial collapse. Considering universally acknowledged fact that this is the worst financial meltdown since the Great Depression, the global economic recovery should be considered if it can grow at 2 percent over the next few years. However, one can never underestimate the power of financial speculation that has now become rampant due to all the money pumped in the economies by the governments. Moreover, one never knows when the next stimulus package will be announced, it could be just round the corner.
COMMODITY CORNER
Long/Short Position of Traders

As on 29nd December 2009
Source: CFTC

Net Change over previous reporting period (22 December 2009) in Brackets
Silver Contract 5000 Troy Ounces
Gold Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Copper contract in 25,000 pounds
Palladium Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Platinum contract in 50 Troy ounces

SILVERAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer 151,647(-305)8,797 (-184)69,048(+752)
Managed Money151,647(-305))28,009(-355)1378(+745)
Swap Dealers151,647(-305)18478 (+512)17,467(-38)


GOLD
All Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer669,947 (-18,265)57,850(+935)255,533(-2,499)
Managed Money669,947 (-18,265)249,131(-6,402)6,024 (+644)
Swap Dealers669,947 (-18,265)38,684(-671)140,586(1,212)


COPPER GRADE 1All Open interestLong Positions
Short Positions
Producer 154,962(+9,003)5,183(+907)78,816(+6,086))
Managed Money154,962(+9,003)44,847(+7,582)29,095(-475)
Swap Dealers154,962(+9,003)64,537(-183)7056 (+860)


PALLADIUM
All Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer22,402(+51)545(+56)16,242(-50)
Managed Money22,402(+51)12,414(-339)788(+62)
Swap Dealers22,402(+51)2,979 (+57)3,410(-74)


PLATINUM
All Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer32,473(-5)505(124)17,582(+170)
Managed Money32,473(-5)17,398(-73)616(-77)
Swap Dealers32,473(-5)4,995(-10)11,353(+97)
Agricultural Commodities Traders' Positions
Source:CFTC

CommoditySugar 11 (ICE)Wheat (CBOT)Rice (CBOT)
Date29 December 200929 December 200929 December 2009
Open Interest1,269,415 (-1,262)437,771 (-2,251)16,821 (-490)
Producer Long307,347 (+4,211)38,088 (-4,484)3,347 (-31)
Producer Short527,279 (-3,127)151,548 (+363)13,791 (735)
Managed Money Long174,643 (-4,448)57,904 (+1,439)3748 (-7)
Managed Money Short7,286 (+3,42866,587 (+1,031)117 (-6)
Swap Dealers Long156,663 (+1,467)168,901(+2,552)2381 (+26)
Swap Dealers Short164,304 (+332)22,982 (-871)0
Others: Long24,759 (-14)14,996 (-336)2,213 (-50)
Others: Short13,200 (+539)20,103 (+1,351)730 (+546)
Change over previous week in brackets

Saturday, 2 January 2010

India Statistics
Factories Registered in India (State-wise), 2005-06
Capital in Rupees Lakhs

StateNo.of FactoriesFixed CapitalProductive CapitalInvested Capital
Andhra Pradesh15,7903,932,3934,467,1755,985,776
Assam1,864752,0351,019,7001,090,976
Bihar1,669292,352433,893529,740
Chattisgarh1,4781,579,1461,849,5782,067,035
Goa543392,137603,444615,388
Gujarat14,05511,953,99614,780,19216,397,187
Haryana4,3041,852,3992,578,3572,987,200
Himachal Pradesh808829,8211,126,1251084540
Jammu & Kashmir519116,996212,175192,497
Jharkhand1,5901,879,9882,108,9062,482,824
Karnataka7,8354,368,8965,510,2896,200,736
Kerala5,643769,4831,193,2231,465,135
Madhya Pradesh2,9511,900,5972,392,9172,976,885
Maharashtra18,71110,197,03813,149,26715,770,422
Manipur598471,4421,364
Meghalaya6632,13358,78342,444
Nagaland1092,8985,9447,314
Orissa1,8622,361,1332,600,6572,867,646
Punjab8,3321,392,5792,292,7192,373,166
Rajasthan6,0051,624,4642,368,1042,390,995
Tamil Nadu21,2656,034,2297,732,8639,376,713
Tripura30712,18623,26927,793
Uttarpradesh15,7903,932,3934,467,1755,985,776
Uttarakhand900419,984683,832728706
West Bengal6,0772,650,0263,514,0484,002,439
Union Territories6,9151,583,1863,278,1412,851,709
All India140,16060,694,02879,140,28890,157,861
Source: Annual Survey Of Industries, Govt of India, 2005-06
India Consumer Durable Ownership Levels

Number of Households owning consumer durable goods per '000 households in the country.

Type of Durables2001-022009-10
Scooters78.6286.28
Motorcycles70.78282.62
Cars30.0391.38
All TVs453.07634.73
Refrigerators134.03224.88
Washing Machines72.04153.98
Airconditioners10.4724.1
Other White Goods247.09451.73
All fansSeptember804.711446.18
Transistors516.79648.65
Source: NCAER, The Great Indian Market
Advantage of a Short-Memory: Case of 2009 Car Sales in India
A cursory glance at some of the Newspapers in India would make any objective observer of the Indian economy marvel at the growth rates that it seems to be achieving over the past couple of months. Little wonder that we have the middle classes being overawed by the 'India story' and even the normally skeptical members of the middle classes frown on the naysayers, who may question the resilience of the Indian economy -especially its supposed recover from the global meltdown.

Evidence of this resilience trickles in every other day, the most important being the rise in the stock market indices.  The latest evidence of India's recovery  to high growth tragectory being the exceptionally large jump in car sales. Such statistical 'evidence' has led to a remarkable complacency in large sections, the last time such complacency was witnessed in India was during January-February 2008 (and we know the results of that).

We decided to look at the car sales statistics from a different part of the room  that is slightly different from the viewing angle of the government and the media. We believe that  spending in the economy is dynamic and month-on-month statistics are more important that a year-on-year comparison. Only then will, we believe get a more wholesome picture.One only needs to look at the statistics released by the Society of Indian Automobile Manufactures (SIAM) on its website to be misled into the soundness of the continuous growth of the Indian Auto Industry. This not to deny that the year-on-year comparisions are not required. On the contrary, we believe that a year-on-year comparision while important (especially for long-term trends), tells us only a part of the story. So we compiled the statistics on a month-on-month basis. A cursory glance at the statistics would make even the novice investor cautious and would probably leave them with more questions about why analysts are being economic with the truth.

A note about the car sales is in order, if we were not to draw the same criticism about being economic with the truth. There are some months that are normally considered lean months for sales. Two such months are March (when banks are more reluctant to give loans due to year end considerations) and December because the end of year and onset of new year will reduce the re-sale value due to year-end considerations. The festival months (September-October) normally see higher than normal sales as these months are the preferred (auspicious) months for the more religious buyers.

Month
2009 Car sales
2008 Car Sales
January
110,212
113,894
February
115,386
94,757
March
128,074
114,145
April
102,899
98,752
May
113,490
110,745
June
107,531
99,741
July
115,067
87,901
August
120,699
96,082
September
129,683
107,517
October
168,043
126,276
November
133,687
83,121
December
119,930
80,402

The above statistics clearly indicate that while the sales are better than the previous year (when there was a near economic paralysis with the banks refusing to lend) the sales are not as good as we are being told. This is because of two reasons. The discounts have increased substantially this year and more importantly, interest rates are at historically low levels. If we were to exclude the festival month of October, then the sales should (at least privately) be making the policy makers sleepless nights. This is probably the reason why the Finance Minister has been categorically stating that it is too early to withdraw the stimulus.

Friday, 1 January 2010

INDIA STATISTICS - Funds Raised in India

Funds Raised in Rs '000 Crores


YEAR
IPO & FPO
Overseas
QIP
2000
3.00
4.3
2001
0.30
22.3
2002
2.00
1.0
2003
2.20
2.9
2004
30.52
22.4
2005
22.80
35.9
2006
24.70
57.3
4.0
2007
45.10
97.8
23.4
2008
16.90
4.6
3.6
2009
16.00
36.4
38.1

Source: Prime Database Quoted in Business Standard, 1st January 2010, p.8.
COMMODITY CORNER
Long/Short Position of Traders

As on 22nd December 2009
Source: CFTC

Net Change over previous reporting period (15 December 2009) in Brackets
Silver Contract 5000 Troy Ounces
Gold Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Copper contract in 25,000 pounds
Palladium Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Platinum contract in 50 Troy ounces

SILVERAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer 151,952(-231)8,981 (-708)68,295(-1,166)
Managed Money151,952(-231)28,364( -602)633(-821)
Swap Dealers151,952(-231)17,966 (-51)17,506(-339)


GOLD
All Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer688,212(-3,908)56,915(+1,455)255,533(-2,499)
Managed Money688,212(-3,908)207,168(-8,036)5,380(+1,489)
Swap Dealers688,212(-3,908)39,355(+5,528)142,068(-7,664)


COPPER GRADE 1All Open interestLong Positions
Short Positions
Producer 145,962(-2,077)4,277(+121)72,730(-1,196)
Managed Money145,962(-2,077)37,265 (-2,730)29,571(-18)
Swap Dealers145,962(-2,077)64,720 (+252)6,196 (-312)


PALLADIUM
All Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer22,351(-29)489(-59)16,292(137)
Managed Money22,351(-29)12,753(+227)726(-143)
Swap Dealers22,351(-29)2,922 (-63)3,484(-81)


PLATINUM
All Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer32,478(-431)381(39)17,412(-567)
Managed Money32,478(-431)17,471(-824)693 (-26)
Swap Dealers32,478(-431)5,005(-101)11,256(-317)

Wednesday, 23 December 2009

7 Looming Financial Bubbles

Recently, Forbes published an article that pointed to seven different areas where there may be financial bubbles. The interesting article does highlight some areas with which we concur but the article completely misses out on some important structural changes that are driving the financial markets in the recent past. The slide show in the artcile points out to seven areas  (reproduced as in their order) where bubbles may be forming including:

1. Gold
2. China
3. Emerging Markets
4. US Treasuries
5. College Tution
6. Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs)
7. Copper

We would probably agree that there is a possibility of a bubble in Gold and maybe even in the US Treasuries while completely agreeing about the likelihood of a bubble in China and Emerging Makets.

One area where we think there will be little scope for a bubble is in the area of Exchange traded funds (ETFs). We believe that the rise of the exchange traded funds is a unique structural change that is taking place in the world of finance. It is likely that these funds will over the next few years replace mutual funds as the preferred investment destintation for a class of investors who willing to take more risks for the sake of higher returns. This is not to suggest that mutual funds will disappear. Instead mutual funds are likely to cater to a different set of investors whose risk profile is completely different from those who invest/speculate in Exchange Traded Funds.

We believe that the rise of ETFs is part of the process of financialisation that has accompanied the growing monetisation which in turn has been accompanied by the increased influence and spread of the financial markets. An important reason why the ETFs are likely to stay is that they not only enable even the most sophisticated speculators who oversee billions of dollars but also enable small time investors/speculators/traders to take directional bets on a particular market or or a particular segment of the market or asset, something that was not possible even five years ago. More importantly, the scope for financial speculation is now truly global. It is now possible for investors in any part of the globe to open trading accounts and buy/sell these funds.

The special appeal of the ETFs is that they have financialised any type of commodity/currency  or their derivatives. These new financialised products are now available to even to an individual investor with limited surplus and little or no leverage. The minimum number of units that an investor has to purchase is one (though it would be uneconomic to purchase such small quantities due to high transaction costs). Investors can now bet on the direction of even something like nuclear power through ETFs (traded under their symbols: PKN, NUCL and NLR), most of the major currencies, most of the commodities and even countries. Since they are avaialble even to investors who can only invest in small amounts they have become popular. It is likely that investors (especially the larger ones) will increasingly consider ETFs as being central to their trading/investing strategies and one should not be surprised if over the next one decade they overtake the Assets Under management of the Mutual funds. Such indications are clearly visible in the exponential growth of some of these funds. Take the case of the SPDR Gold Trust (Symbol: GLD). Over the years (it was originally listed in 2004), it has emerged as the sixth largest holder of gold (1132.71 tonnes as on 22 December 2009) exceeding most of the countries of the world.

There are also growing concerns about the economic impact on the real (actual economy and not the financial markets) that these financialised funds  are having. It has also led to record trading in those commodity futures. The case of the United States Natural Gas Fund (Symbol: UNG) and the recent debate about the size of the fund because it owned nearly 20 percent of the outstanding natural gas contracts in the USA and its subsequnet problems with the US Regulator, CFTC. It led to a change in rules.

The ETFs have drawn widespread interest due to their ability to facilitate financial speculation  by reducing costs (since they are traded like any other securities,) liquidity, as well as their abiliity  to attract even people with limited resources. This is a far cry from the past when speculating in some of the important markets in the sphere of commodity and currencies were limited to institutional players. Unlike in the past, one need not (though it is still preferable) to be close to the metropolis to speculate in the financial markets. ETFs combined with technology means that one could reside in any part of the world and still specluate (successfully).

It is pertinent to note that a number of these funds have been unable to meet the demand and have frequently had to approach the regulators in order to increase the shares that they would like to issue. The most recent is the currency ETF (symbol: UUP).

Another important innovation in the world of global finance is the possiblity of betting on the possibility of a country going bankrupt through the purchase of a Credit Default Swap (CDS). This is supposed to work as an insurance policy on a country. It rises when investors perceive there to be trouble in the economy of a country. This is precisely the problem in the world of present day modern day finance. There need not be actual economic trouble at that juncture,  but if a set of influential institutional investors think that there is trouble then the CDS may start rising and that would in turn lead to more capital fleeing the country, thereby accentuating the decline, which may have started with a speculative attack (more on this later as it is beyond the scope of this post).

Welcome to the world of highly speculative agile world of capital.

Read this interesting article on money managers who are now activing as "risk Vigilantes"

Speculators have never had it so good: Zero percent interest rates, sovereign guarantee for banks means that our money is safe (at least as long as the government is solvent) and amazing choice of financial products to speculate on.

Tuesday, 22 December 2009

COMMODITY CORNER
Long/Short Position of Traders

As on 15 December 2009
Source: CFTC

Net Change over previous reporting period (8th December 2009) in Brackets
Silver Contract 5000 Troy Ounces
Gold Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Copper contract in 25,000 pounds
Palladium Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Platinum contract in 50 Troy ounces

SILVER
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
152,183(-5,126)
9,689 (-930)
69,461(-2,082)
Managed Money
152,183(-5,126)
28,966(-5,516)
1,454(890)
Swap Dealers
152,183(-5,126)
18,018 (+1,252)
17,845(-1,573)


GOLD
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
692,120 (-2,530)
55,461(+233)
258,031(+3,938)
Managed Money
692,120 (-2,530)
215,204 (-1,557)
3,891 (-217)
Swap Dealers
692,120 (-2,530)
33,827(-1,508)
149,731(-1,610)


COPPER GRADE 1
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
148,040(-138)
4,156(+68)
73,926(-1,563)
Managed Money
148,040(-138)
39,995 (-2,490)
29,589(+1,220)
Swap Dealers
148,040(-138)
64,468 (+272)
6,508 (-550)


PALLADIUM
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
22,380(-524)
548(-817)
16,155(-1,178)
Managed Money
22,380(-524)
12,526(+375)
869(+23)
Swap Dealers
22,380(-524)
2,985 (-48)
3,565(+773)


PLATINUM
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
32,909(-1,211)
342(-57)
17,979(-1,096)
Managed Money
32,909(-1,211)
18,295(-185)
719 (+3)
Swap Dealers
32,909(-1,211)
5,106(-33)
11,573(-278)

Sunday, 13 December 2009

COMMODITY CORNER
Long/Short Position of Traders

As on 8 December 2009
Source: CFTC

Net Change over previous reporting period (5th December 2009) in Brackets
Silver Contract 5000 Troy Ounces
Gold Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Copper contract in 25,000 pounds
Palladium Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Platinum contract in 50 Troy ounces

SILVER
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
157,310(-9,413)
10,619 (-225)
71,543(-3,102)
Managed Money
157,310(-9,413))
34,482(-3,014)
564(-241)
Swap Dealers
157,310(-9,413)
16,766 (-1,632)
19,418(-825)


GOLD
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
694,650 (-22,775)
55,227(-4,064)
254,094 (-4,473)
Managed Money
694,650 (-22,775)
216,761 (-15,337)
4,108 (-3,057)
Swap Dealers
694,650 (-22,775)
35,335 (-4,553)
148,122(-15,437)


COPPER GRADE 1
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
148,178(-904)
4,088(-703)
75,489(+1,485)
Managed Money
148,178(-904)
64,196 (+1620)
28,369 (+464)
Swap Dealers
148,178(-904)
64,196 (-573)
7,058 (-256)


PALLADIUM
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
22,904(-367)
1,365 (-98)
17,333 (-179)
Managed Money
22,904(-367)
12,151 (+111)
846(+119)
Swap Dealers
22,904(-367)
3,033 (-213)
2,792(-326)


PLATINUM
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
34,120(-1,735)
399(+39)
19,075(-809)
Managed Money
34,120(-1,735)
18,477(-1,480)
716 (+17)
Swap Dealers
34,120(-1,735)
5,139(+26)
11,851(-817)

Saturday, 5 December 2009

COMMODITY CORNER
Long/Short Position of Traders

As on 1 December 2009
Source: CFTC

Net Change over previous reporting period (24 Nov 2009) in Brackets
Silver Contract 5000 Troy Ounces
Gold Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Copper contract in 25,000 pounds
Palladium Contract in 100 Troy Ounces
Platinum contract in 50 Troy ounces

SILVER
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
166,722(-1,742)
10,845 (-636)
74,645(-1,783)
Managed Money
166,722(-1,742))
37,496(-73)
805(+171)
Swap Dealers
166,722(-1,742)
18,398 (+8)
20,242(+690)


GOLD
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
717,426 (+23,765)
59,291(+4,292)
258,657 (-6,258)
Managed Money
717,426 (+23,765)
233,099 (-941)
7,164(+3,081)
Swap Dealers
717,426 (+23,765)
39,888 (-1,420)
163,559(+13,273)

COPPER GRADE 1
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
149,082(-3,110)
4,791 (+519)
74,004(-524)
Managed Money
149,082(-3,110)
40,865 (+457)
27,905 (+348)
Swap Dealers
149,082(-3,110)
64,769 (+712)
7,314 (-564)

PALLADIUM
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
23,271 (0)
1,463(0)
17,512 (0)
Managed Money
23,271(0)
12,040 (0))
727(0)
Swap Dealers
23,271(0)
3,246 (0)
3,118(0)

PLATINUM
All Open interest
Long Positions
Short Positions
Producer
35,855 (0)
360(0)
19,884(0)
Managed Money
35,855 (0)
19,957(0)
699 (0)
Swap Dealers
35,855 (0)
5,113(0)
12,668(0)

Friday, 4 December 2009

COMMODITY CORNER
Long/Short Position of Traders

As on 24 November 2009
Source: CFTC

Net Change in Brackets

SILVERAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer168,465(-23,594)11,481 (+1,146)76,429(+2,251)
Managed Money168,465(-23,594)37,569 (-824)634(-135)
Swap Dealers168,465(-23,594)18,390 (+377)19,552(-207)

GOLDAll Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer693,661 (-80,020)54,999(-8,986)264,824 (+2,109)
Managed Money693,661 (-80,020)233,039 (-465)4,083(+249)
Swap Dealers693,661 (-80,020)41,308 (+2,799)150,286 (-1,265)

COPPER GRADE 1All Open interestLong PositionsShort Positions
Producer152,192 (+464)5,310 (-610)74,528(+995)
Managed Money152,192 (+464)40,408 (+1,544)27,558 (+244)
Swap Dealers152,192 (+464)64,057 (-505)7,878 (-532)

Friday, 27 November 2009

The Bears are Back, and more ferocious

(Please consider this more as a preliminary post and the usual research notes with stats, references and charts will be posted over the weekend).

The events surrounding Dubai have led to a renewed round of panic in the markets. It has brought back fears of the financial crisis. The crisis owes its origin to those who are in a perpetual state of intellectual deficiency and were convinced that building those castles in the sand and the sea were good business propositions (and all those morons who actually bought them). The Dubai problem is not per se very large - "only" about 60 billion dollars. But that has upset the "sentiment" which could be rebuilt only after all the government's pumped in about US$12.9 trillion over the past year. This default( though not yet in a technical sense) is likely to lead to exactly all those changes that took place after Lehman, only a more grand scale with all emerging markets likely to be hit by risk aversion, which will lead to a shooting up of the cost of debt and increase their spreads. Imagine this is the position of a government that has liquid assets in the form of oil, which is anyway rising because of speculators. What will it be like if others are hit?

The best case scenario is this: Fed and all the other governments' step in and go back to pumping in another 2 or 5 trillion dollars. That will lead to exactly the type of situation that we saw since march. I think we are likely to have that. Then after the fall, we will have commodities shoot up. It is likely that we will have a dip in the markets and a rise after that (a false dawn) which should probably be used to get out of the markets. The commodity market is likely to witness a 20 percent correction (in the worst case another 35% correction). If you have the stomach for it, short oil below 74. In the intraday hourly chart, it looks like it is likely to break the 75.35 level, which is the head and shoulder break. That should be stop loss. It is getting short-term support at 74.50 level. if that holds then good or else the next major support is 74. If there is a rise in the market over the next week (major trading will take place in the US only on Monday) then use the rally to take up short positions - if one is an aggressive trader. For the next one week there are only two good places, USD and US Treasury bonds. (i know both are bad

In the worst case: Dow will go back to 5000. I think that sums up the worst case in a sentence.

There is one very interesting development that we have been talking about: bond funds drawing a lot of funds over the past two months. Looks like the bond market has got the whole thing right, as usual Equity market it turns out is the dumb money. Currency guys are the thundering hordes who are jumping all over the place, and well commodity markets are somewhere in the middle.

One should not be surprised if the UST10 year note heads back to 127 or even 131.

The Dollar index is most important and interesting. 75.16 is a critical level but the important level to really look out for is the 76.30 level. if it is not able to move above that then expect a new low (well below 70) for the Dollar Index. (my personal level is that it could probably test that and may take out the 76.30 level over the next one month. if it takes out that level by Monday then expect a big rally in USD. Any close above 75.85 on a weekly basis will mean that we have hit a bottom in the dollar index.

Gold market is the next important market to watch out for. Normally in times of crisis (like the one that we are likely to have now with the start of the sovereign defaults) Gold should do well - but, "THIS TIME IT IS DIFFERENT". (pls dont get me wrong when i say that). I think gold is due for a very sharp big (good) correction. This are for a number of reasons:

1. Gold is anyway due for a sharp correction. It has returned 34 pc this year.
2. It may well turn out to be a "buy on rumour, sell on fact case".
3. There are huge long positions in gold in various commodity markets. They are likely to be liquidated.
4. The most important reason is that gold is likely to be sold because, all those who face margin calls are likely to sell gold positions and pay the margin call (i would do that if i were in their position - rather than part with cash, so likely that everybody would do that).
5. Fundamentally, this actually long-term good news for gold. I think governments will keep pumping in more money (now they have a good excuse) and that should lead to gold shooting up in the long term (after this correction). so utilise this correction to buy gold and as a second best alternative, its poorer cousin gold.

For all those who are still comfortable with only buying (long only) buy Exchange traded funds like VXX and FAZ. Then... sit back and enjoy the ride. Nobody in their senses would have actually been comfortable when the VIX touched 20.

I must confess that i was not able to sleep well since it touched 35, but that is the problem, i get on to the train even before they have refueled it for their journey, and i get off just as it has reached its first stop, leave alone the actual destination, but that could be the reason why I have lived to fight another day in the markets.

Happy trading.

Monday, 23 November 2009

10 Year U.S. TREASURY BONDS - CHICAGO BOARD OF TRADE
Commitments of Traders (Delta-adjusted Options & Futures Combined)
November 17, 2009
Category Quantity of Positions
Total Open Interest1,720,039(+159,633)
Non-Commercial Long172,398 (+30,882)
Non-Commercial Short243,210 (+42,468
Commercial Long1,008,638(+31,407)
Commercial Short923,703(-1,560)
Total Long1,417,825(+120,029)
Total Short1,403,703 (+199,926)
Source: CFTC
NYMEX Light Sweet Crude
Disaggregated Commitments of Traders(Options & Futures Combined),
November 17, 2009
Category Quantity of Positions
Total Open Interest2,491,200 (-417,670)
Producer Long293,262 (-25,770)
Producer Short512,711
Managed Money Long189,923 (-9,212)
Managed Money Short40,787 (-1,560)
Managed Money Spreading269,425 (-70,354)
Swap Dealers Long214,673 (+48,907)
Swap Dealers Short176,813 (+9,054)
Swap Dealers Spreading829,158 (-235,640)
Source: CFTC

Sunday, 22 November 2009

Deciphering the Rising Baltic Dry Index
The past two months has seen a rise in most of the asset classes. One index that has outperformed all other indices is the Baltic Dry Index, the index that is considered to be a barometer of the world's shipping freight charges. Over the past two months the index has nearly doubled from about 2163 to about 4668. This has led to renewed optimism that the global economy is on the path to a recovery. This is because, shipping (along with other transportation indices) were some of the few advance indicators that signalled the present recession.

The Baltic Dry Index is an index that is computed from the average of twenty two bulk cargoes on a futures basis including iron ore, coal, cement, steel and food grains. It is quoted every working day at 1300 GMT. The index does not include wet goods such as crude oil. The index is a daily average of shipping freight rates. The important feature of the index (and its relevance) may be due to the fact that it is not a tradable contract and is exclusively the preserve of actual users of shipping services. It does not directly include short-term speculative inflows (or ‘hot money’) directly. There are however, derivative products (futures) introduced by other exchanges (the International Maritime Exchange, MAREX) that trade on Baltic Dry Index. There are a number of other ways to trade shipping freight including exchange traded funds like Claymore/Delta Shipping Index exchange traded fund. This exchange traded fund (ETF) trades under the symbol SEA. The ETF does not replicate the BDI and instead invests in shipping companies.

Bubbleomania’s Note of Caution: Be more circumspect on the BDI
The fact that the index was one of the earliest indicators that warned of an impending crisis, has led the investing public to become enamoured with the movement of the index over the past couple of months. While in the past it rare to come across a price quote of the index, it has now become common for the financial media to give this index great prominence, probably a contrarian indicator that should warn investors that it is time to move on to another indicator. Investors as well as observers may be well advised to be more watchful that giving primacy to the index. Circumspection may be in order because it is imperative for investors to keep in mind the fundamental of economics – Demand and Supply – before overemphasising the importance to any one indicator. The global economy is far too complex, sophisticated and dynamic for investors to depend solely on only one indicator. To place the BDI in perspective, it rose from about 5600 in early 2008 to a record of 11,793 in mid-2008 and in the aftermath of the Lehman Brothers’ bankruptcy it collapsed to a low of 666 in December 2008-in about six months.

Baltic Dry Index
                   
If we were to over emphasise the indicator with all the irrationality of a financial herd, then we would have to believe that the world trade would double (as the index more than doubled in 2008) and then expect the world trade to collapse by 98 percent by the end of 2008. WTO indicated that world trade would decline by about ten percent. In May 2009, the New York Times quoted a report that indicated that nearly 735 ships were anchored in ports, due to lack uneconomical freight charges. This seems to have turned around as the present rates would make freight profitable on all routes for the companies. This is not to claim that the BDI as an indicator is redundant.

Questions Galore, Answers limited:
Among the many questions that investors and observers would now have to grapple would be:
-What is the likely consequence of the near doubling of the BDI?
-Does it merely reflect the bubbles that are likely to be being built in the other asset classes of the nearly 150% increase in the monetary base in the US economy?
-Is it the harbinger of a new era of economic prosperity that all of us so desperately yearn for after more than a year of financial turmoil that has not been witnessed since the end of the Second World War?
-Does it indicate that the commodity bull market has just been renewed with great vigour?
-What would be the impact of the rising cost of shipping on the weak recovery?


The simplest answer would: Nobody knows accurately. But nevertheless we hope to provide some valuable insights, which hopefully should enable investors to come to their own informed opinion.

Why is the BDI rising?
The simple answer would be that there is a large, rising demand for commodities in the emerging markets, especially China. Undoubtedly, there is some truth in that assertion, though it would be difficult to quantify the exact quantum of that impact on movement of the index on the movement of the index. There are a number of important factors that have to be kept in mind. The crisis of 2008 has dramatically altered the landscape of the shipping industry (as with most of the other industries).

It should be kept in mind that the recent boom led to an exponential large increase in world trade, due to globalisation, which necessitated the need for more number of ships. This shipbuilding activity increased with the boom, and ship orders increased, especially in 2007. Considering the fact that it takes nearly two years for ordered ships to be delivered, these will increase in 2009 and 2010. It has been pointed out that capacity addition to the present fleet will be to the tune of about 60 percent of existing fleet capacity.

A critical element in the future of shipping would be the state of the economy as a natural corollary, the demand for goods. This unfortunately is likely to be the Achilles heel for the shipping industry. Recent statements by some of the shipping companies is instructive of what we can expect from the sector. A.P Moeller-Maersk, the owner of the largest container shipping line has announced that volumes are likely to grow by 3 percent to 8 percent in 2010. That would indicate that the world economy is unlikely to grow at a pace that the optimists think as it essentially means that the growth is likely to come after a 10 percent drop in container traffic in 2009. The third largest container shipping company CMA is reported to have stated that the while the Europe-Asia route has seen some recovery, the US-Asia route is yet to see demand pick up. Some analysts have pointed out that the proportion of the container fleet that was idel was likely to rise to 15 percent or een 20 percent over the next year.

What is causing the BDI to rise?
The quick answer would be imports by China of Iron Ore, Coal and oil. The Chinese continue to increase their import of most of the commodities, including copper, lead, iron ore, coal as well as oil. This demand is likely to increase as China has announced that it would like to establish a coal reserve that would store at least about 10 percent of the annual consumption in the reserve. The recent rising food prices has only increased the demand.

It is pertinent to note that companies tend to start building stocks for the forthcoming Christmas shopping season, we are likely to see this happening. The fact that business inventories are at their lowest levels in recent years only seems to be aiding the movement of goods.

Two important developments seem to be causing the BDI to rise. The first is the consequence of the financial crisis, where shipping companies were forced to close due to the non-availability of credit. This is to be seen in the context of the fact that shipping a capital intensive business. It has been pointed out that the collapse in the credit markets led to an estimated US$350 billion of orders for new ships unfinanced. To this may be added the cost consequnces of partly funded orders/loans which were cancelled as the banks continue to pull back. This is not likely to improve over the next year.

A second important factor that is positive for the shipping sector and a predominant factor that is supportive of the shipping prices are ironically the activities of speculators in the oil market.

Another important cause for the rise in the Baltic Dry Index seem to be the rise in short positions in the futures segment of the BDI futures. The October 2009 futures indicate that there seem indicte that the rally may have more to do with futures market issue (again a consequence of financialisation) rather than those based on demand and supply of actual goods.


Source: IMAREX
The following chart provides a snapshot of the rising trading in the futures and derivatives segments of the BDI futures.



Source: IMAREX

The charts below provide an overview of the problem of rising inventories in China. This should be a cause for concern as the recent boom in the commodity sector as well as rise in the Baltic Dry Index was largely to import of commodities by China. The Chart below indicate the problem of rising inventories in Shanghai (Copper Inventories)


Source: Bloomberg

Zinc inventories in China too are at their highest level since 2007.

                            
Source: Bloomberg.

A counter weight to the above problem would be that the BDI may find support from the import of Coal and food grains. The world will continue to remain short of food grains and since countries like Philippines and India have announced large import of food grains, this likely to remain supportive of prices in mid 2010, if not a bullish factor.

Interestingly, the number of ships that are waiting for coal load has not increased as one may have expected, considering the Euphoria that we have seen. It has remained more or less constant within the range that we had seen in between 2008-09 as can be discerned from the chart of New Castle Mining port authorities:


Source: Bloomberg

Reasons to be Cautious:
-Shipping freight derivatives for 2010 and beyond imply lower freight rates.
-New ship deliveries are estimated to approach 34 million DWT of capacity in 2009, there is a possibility of another 26 million DWT being added to the capacity, though shipping companies can delay the deliveries.
-What is more worrisome is the fact that we have been witnessing a continuous rise in inventories of various base metals, including copper and lead, among others. If demand were not to return in 2010 due to a faltering global economy, it is likely to lead to yet another round of collapse in the shipping sector as the sector is likely to be hit by increasing capacity which will be aggravated to high commodity inventories.
-According to Paris-based AXS-Alphaliner, 10.7 per cent of the world’s container ship capacity is now laid up out of use, with most of the idle ships belonging to independent owners

Hence, investors may be well advised not to over-emphasise the importance of the Baltic Dry index, while at the same time, we should not be hasty to dismiss the index as redundant.